Sundance: Understand How Your Social Media Voice Becomes The Enemy In 2024, And The Connection To Kamala “BRAT” Harris

Many people are well aware of that the Dept of Homeland Security, (DHS – part of the domestic Intelligence Community structure), previously triggered a myriad of activities and actions to control the online speech of Americans.

Factually, despite the previous understandings about Big Tech de-platforming, demonetization, shadow banning and censorship, it took the Twitter-File revelations to put actual context to what the FBI, DHS, CISA and various domestic intelligence communities were doing.

Everyone knew Big Tech via Google, Instagram, Facebook, etc were using every resource to control information sharing and shut down speech.  In the bigger picture this can be looked at as an effort to control online communication.

Controlling online communication is not only about the content of the voice (under the guise of dis-mis-malinformation), but also about controlling the visibility of the scale of voices who agree.

It’s like an ideologically like-minded crowd in a stadium, if you can stop them at the entry points, the stadium looks sparse as the crowd is forcibly turned away. You don’t know that tens of millions of people agree with you.

We are the majority, they just control the platforms that give us the impression of size.

There is a difference between ‘the real world’, and the ‘online world’.  Tens-of-thousands of attendees to numerous and frequent Donald Trump rallies are a visual demonstration of scale, while dozens or hundreds attended the same for Joe Biden.

There are other examples like random site-specific polls (non-media influenced), spontaneous assemblies, boat parades, etc.  In every ‘real world’ example, the ordinary American electorate visibly dominate the scope of support.

However, part of voting fraud is presenting the optic of support for the candidate who benefits from fraudulent ballot collection.  The extra ballots must be believable, or there can be a problem.

It is within this “online dynamic” that control, censorship and every mechanism within the arsenal of social media big tech is deployed.  This is a critical aspect to truly understand.

In the years leading up to this 2024 election, we have watched closely as every pathway for online voices has been shaped, changed and in some cases eliminated.

One example is very close to home here at CTH, where Google has said -directly- the content within the comment section is the justification for their demonetization.

If The Conservative Treehouse does not shut down comments, Google Ads (controlling 75% of all online revenue) will NOT be permitted.  ¹The goal is to shut down the conversation.

Let that sink in for a moment if you didn’t already.  It’s not the content of the website that generates the censorship, it is the CONVERSATION in the comment section that Google is concerned about.

Take that example as an empirical datapoint and then extend it.  Now you understand why the comment sections in various platforms have been removed, and even worse the 3rd-party software plug in (like Disquis) is heavily controlled and moderated.

What big tech has been doing is funneling everyone into the social media platforms in order to possess their online conversations about current events, and news.

If you espouse an opinion that may be popular yet is against the interests of those who are controlling the political space, your content is removed (Ex. Facebook, Insta, etc.), as well as your ability to speak.

If they can funnel everyone into a place where conversation is controlled, then people cannot grasp the scale of the like-minded assembly.  That’s the feature of their control.

The need for control is a reaction to fear, and what the IC (big tech) fear most is that online we repeat what historically was seen in the Polish Solidarity Movement.

When millions of people took to the streets to see Pope John Paul II, they suddenly realized they were the majority, and the representatives of government were the minority.  In only a few months thereafter, everything changed.

Remember, this online speech and assembly control through social media and Big Tech was the impetus for the Dept of State strategy during the Arab Spring.

Fast forward 15 years later, and every mechanism of the domestic IC through social media is being deployed to see a message of alignment for Kamala Harris. 

You need to understand how the Intelligence Community is operating to control the gates to the stadium, then think like an insurgent and keep communicating to the majority. We are in an abusive relationship with Government. The abuser doesn’t want the abused to visit her family, because it could generate a dangerous awakening.

This is what the 2024 election comes down to.  We must highlight the smallness of the Harris support network, then James Clyburn will have a really tough time trying to convince people that 81 million voted for Kamala like Biden. 

Remember! The enemy will use every online tool in their arsenal to make sure the majority do not realize they are in the majority

Everything around you is being controlled to manufacture an outcome that is disconnected from reality. It is through this prism, you should view events.

When you understand this, you understand the importance of being loud and proud. You must ignore the control mechanisms, set your fears aside and state openly what you believe.

Kamala Harris was the border Czar, Donald Trump was shot in the ear with a bullet, Joe Biden has dementia, Derek Chauvin didn’t murder George Floyd, Donald Trump didn’t collude with Russia, Brett Kavanaugh wasn’t a gang rapist, Jussie Smollett isn’t the victim of a hate crime, Hunter Biden’s laptop wasn’t Russian disinformation, COVID didn’t originate in a wet market, Joe Biden didn’t get 81 million legal votes, J6 wasn’t an insurrection, mRNA vaccines don’t stop the spread, Putin didn’t blow up Nord Stream Pipeline, and men can’t get pregnant.

Does the 2024 Big Tech goal give us a different perspective on why TikTok is considered a “threat to democracy?” Remember, violence supported by the IC is considered speech, (see Antifa). Meanwhile, speech that is against the interests of the IC is considered violence. More to follow.

Trump Rally – Charlotte, North Carolina, 7/24/24

¹I told them to f**k off.